A key risk is the one-sided focus on high-frequency locations: if investments are geared exclusively towards highly frequented areas, other districts and peripheral locations risk falling behind. This can lead to uneven urban development, vacancies and a declining quality of life. Closely linked to this is the risk of gentrification. If rents rise in popular locations as a result of targeted gentrification, smaller, owner-managed businesses can be increasingly squeezed out. The result is a market in which large chains or financially strong brand spaces are able to assert themselves. The result: an impoverishment of the supply structure. Smaller companies also suffer from unequal access to technology and data with fewer financial and human resources, which further exacerbates competitive disadvantages.
On the visitor side, a one-sided focus of city marketing can distort consumer behavior by constantly directing visitors to the same places and thus suppressing diversity and individual shopping routes. Last but not least, there are data protection concerns among the population and the feeling of being monitored.